|
Teaching Philosophy Success
in trumpet playing depends on three things:
talent, intelligence, and desire. It
is my belief that students at Henderson are as talented and intelligent as
trumpet students anywhere in the country. Motivation,
therefore, is the key element to their success. Before
I can begin work to this end, it is necessary to earn students' trust and
confidence. They need to know that
I care for them as individuals and that I ask as much of myself as I do of them.
I learn from my students and from my own mistakes, both in playing and in
teaching trumpet. Openness with my students, sharing my failures and
shortcomings with them, engenders trust. This
allows me to more openly discuss each student's strengths and weaknesses.
This feedback is put in perspective against both the minimum standards I
expect and the student’s own abilities. The
uniqueness of each individual requires flexibility in motivation strategies.
Strategies for each individual must also change in response to outside
pressures, such as jobs, parents, peers, other classes, etc.
I discourage students from working to please me, rather, I encourage them
to excel for their own sakes. Growing
maturity levels in students require constant re-evaluation by the teacher.
Some of the various techniques I use include: One
of the realities of teaching I have had to accept is that students change with
the times. Strategies that were
effective twenty-five years ago no longer work. Recently I have begun discussions with students in this area.
As a result, I have made changes in my grading scales that have helped
many students work harder. I
dislike using grades as a motivator, but they do help students keep working
through slumps. Students
will rise to the level of their teacher's expectations, but an increase in
standards that is too drastic will discourage many. As my relationship with my studio has grown, I have gradually
and continually raised standards of performance.
In 1994 I began development of a Course of Study to set challenging goals
that could be met by hard-working, ambitious students. Spread over nine
semesters, the Course of Study takes students from the very basics to a level
that would be comparable to graduate students at most schools.
Each semester lists the music to be covered; the first four semesters are
also broken down into suggested weekly assignments. I
find it necessary to provide a lot of flexibility within the standards I
require. Individual preferences for
styles of music and outside pressures from other classes seem to be best met by
allowing students some freedom of choice within the required material.
The Course of Study increases in both technical and musical difficulty
each semester. Within each semester, however, it tends to be fairly stable.
Some exercises are short and easy to learn; others are long and of
greater difficulty. During a
“rough week” students generally pick easier pieces, but they know that if
they do this for several weeks they will eventually be overloaded with difficult
works. Critical
thinking is strongly encouraged in my trumpet students.
The flexibility in assignments confronts the students with many
decisions, such as: what aspects of
their playing need improvement, what do they have time and motivation to
accomplish within a week, are they prepared well enough to have the exercise
crossed off, etc. I point out music
theory relationships when they are important to learning the piece and playing
it well. Students are encouraged to
do their own analysis of the music to decrease the learning curve. |
|